Anonymous

RCMP dossier: "Complexion: Other": Difference between revisions

From lisamarieyoung.ca
m
Text replacement - "<ref name=.hss20170911.+..ref>" to "{{HSS20170911}}"
m (Text replacement - "<ref name=.dossier2021.+..ref>" to "{{Dossier2021}}")
m (Text replacement - "<ref name=.hss20170911.+..ref>" to "{{HSS20170911}}")
Line 31: Line 31:


These are '''both''' wrong.
These are '''both''' wrong.
* Lisa was &frac12; Indigenous and &frac12; Caucasian.<ref name="hss20170911">Eric Plummer, <span class='hss logo'></span>Ha-Shilth-Sa (Sep 11, 2017), ''[https://hashilthsa.com/news/2017-09-11/remembering-missing-and-murdered-nuu-chah-nulth-women-and-girls "Remembering missing and murdered Nuu-chah-nulth women and girls"]'' <span style='font-size:66%;'>[https://lisamarieyoung.ca/n/hss20170911 hss20170911]</span></ref> She's been referred to as ''"fair-skinned"''.
* Lisa was &frac12; Indigenous and &frac12; Caucasian.{{HSS20170911}} She's been referred to as ''"fair-skinned"''.


* <u>Nobody</u> has a complexion of ''"Other"''.  This change was made by request of a family member who was unsatisfied with the term ''"Dark"'', but why would investigators not remove the ''"Complexion"'' field altogether, if there was no better option to choose than ''"Other"''?
* <u>Nobody</u> has a complexion of ''"Other"''.  This change was made by request of a family member who was unsatisfied with the term ''"Dark"'', but why would investigators not remove the ''"Complexion"'' field altogether, if there was no better option to choose than ''"Other"''?