Call back in 5 days: Difference between revisions

From lisamarieyoung.ca
m (Text replacement - " new job " to " new job ")
mNo edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
<div style="text-align:right; font-size:85%; font-family:sans-serif;">&mdash;Nanaimo RCMP to Lisa's parents<br>
<div style="text-align:right; font-size:85%; font-family:sans-serif;">&mdash;Nanaimo RCMP to Lisa's parents<br>
July 2, 2002</div>
July 2, 2002</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></div>__TOC__
</div>
__TOC__
<!--<div>
[[Call_back_in_48_hours | Previous]]
[[RCMP didn't "suspect foul play" for 10 days | Next]]
</div>-->
<br style="clear:both"/>
<br style="clear:both"/>
== Summary ==
== Summary ==
After an RCMP officer finally showed up in response to the report of Lisa's disappearance, he picked up a photo of Lisa, and then promptly went on several scheduled days off.
After an RCMP officer finally showed up in response to the report of Lisa's disappearance, he picked up a photo of Lisa, and then promptly went on several scheduled days off.


Line 19: Line 12:


== Detail ==
== Detail ==
{{NDN20020704g.png|left}}
{{NDN20020704g.png|left}}
{{NW20150501a.png|right|325px}}
{{NW20150501a.png|right|325px}}
Line 43: Line 35:
<br style="clear:both"/>
<br style="clear:both"/>
== See also ==
== See also ==
* '''Next''' ➜ [[RCMP didn't "suspect foul play" for 10 days | '''RCMP didn't <q>suspect foul play</q> for 10 days''']]
* '''Next''' ➜ [[RCMP didn't "suspect foul play" for 10 days | '''RCMP didn't <q>suspect foul play</q> for 10 days''']]
* [[Reasons to suspect foul play]]
* List of all issues on '''''[[:Category:Lisa's List of Fifty|Lisa's List of Fifty]]'''''
* List of all issues on '''''[[:Category:Lisa's List of Fifty|Lisa's List of Fifty]]'''''
 
* 2002-Sep-18 ''[[ndn20020918|Grim Task: Police comb woods for Lisa Young]]'' <small style='whitespace:nowrap'><span class='logo ndn'></span></span>[[:Category:Nanaimo Daily News|Nanaimo Daily News]]</small>
* 2020-Dec-17 ''[[cn20201217|Nanaimo RCMP conduct new searches in nearly two-decade-old case]]'' (video) <small style='whitespace:nowrap'><span class='logo cn'></span></span>[[:Category:CHEK News|CHEK News]]</small>
* [[Call back in 48 hours]]
* [[RCMP ignored neighbours' report of burial]]
* [[RCMP failed to proactively publicize Lisa's case]]
* [[RCMP failed to check cellphone records]]
* [[RCMP failed to check for bank account activity]]
* [[RCMP failed to obtain security camera recordings]]
* [[RCMP failed to question bar patrons or Lisa’s friends]]
* [[Timeline: July 1, 2002]]
* [[RCMP statements]]
* [[Lisa had been missing 80 days before the RCMP's first ground search]]
* [[Search was delayed 18 days due to RCMP prioritization of simple 2 day case]]
* [[RCMP's first search was focused more on officer training than on Lisa]]
* [[RCMP lied about planned searches for Lisa]]
* [[RCMP lied about how often they searched for Lisa]]
* [[RCMP staffing issues prevented additional searches for Lisa]]
* [[Re-enactment: "exhaustive search by Nanaimo RCMP"|Re-enactment: ''"exhaustive search by Nanaimo RCMP"'']]
* [[Tips]]
* [[:Category:Family searches|Category: Family searches]]
* [[:Category:RCMP searches|Category: RCMP searches]]
* [[:Category:RCMP delays‏‎|Category: RCMP delays‏‎]]
* [[:Category:RCMP vs Crime Stoppers‏‎|Category: RCMP vs Crime Stoppers‏‎]]


== Sources ==
== Sources ==

Latest revision as of 04:14, 19 November 2024

“The officer who took the initial report
is away until Friday...”
—Nanaimo RCMP to Lisa's parents
July 2, 2002


Summary

After an RCMP officer finally showed up in response to the report of Lisa's disappearance, he picked up a photo of Lisa, and then promptly went on several scheduled days off.

Lisa's parents were informed of this after several unsuccessful attempts to follow up with the attending officer the next morning, and they were advised to call back when the officer was back at work.

Detail

the uniformed officer who took the initial report Sunday is away until Friday
Nanaimo Daily News, July 4, 2002 (Paul Walton)[1]
He asked some questions and took a photograph of Lisa. Then he told them he was off for the next four days and to call him on Friday. [Lisa's parents] were incredulous. This was on a Sunday. [When they contacted the media] a reporter came over right away.]
Native Women's Association of Canada, May 1, 2015 (Allison Crowe)[2]

As the day went on and Lisa's parents grew increasingly anxious, they made several more calls to the RCMP that day.[3] Their persistence finally resulted in a uniformed officer stopping by in the evening, though only to pick up a photo of Lisa.[1][2]


Lisa was to begin a new job
Nanaimo Daily News, July 10, 2002 (Paul Walton)[4]
they said just give it 48 hours
MP Paul Manly, House of Commons, Dec 8, 2020[5]

Urgency increased the next morning when Lisa failed to show up for her first day of work at a new job she'd been eager to start.[4] Seeking an update of the RCMP's findings, Lisa's parents tried to contact the officer who'd attended the night before. After several calls they were told that he'd gone on several scheduled days off, and they were advised to call back after that.[6]


Nothing's come up that would suggest foul play, we just don't know where she is. Const. Murray Conway [anim gif]
Nanaimo Daily News, July 4, 2002 (Paul Walton)[1]
she was immediately put on the national police computer
Nanaimo Daily News, July 4, 2002 (Paul Walton)[1]

The July 4th, 2002 edition of the Nanaimo Daily News, included a quote from RCMP Cst. Murray Conway: "Nothing's come up that would suggest foul play, we just don't know where she is".[1]

By this point, the only known progress by the RCMP was that Lisa's case had been "put on the national police computer".[1][7]


See also

Sources